Google’s PaLM vs ChatGPT: Is PaLM Ready to Take on the GPT Challenge and Threaten Google’s Dominance?
In the last few months, OpenAI has launched a wide variety of products, including Instruct AI and DALLE. ChatGPT, with its machine learning capabilities, has generated a lot of hype among developers and users. It offers a level of machine learning that no other AI chatbot can rival.
With ChatGPT, you can have human-like conversations with chatbots, and it works well up to a certain point. However, Philip Wang, a developer known for reverse engineering closed-source AI systems, recently introduced a text-generating model called “PALM+RLHF” that may replace ChatGPT. That is why we are discussing it now.
Will Google’s PaLM replace OpenAI’s ChatGPT? Let’s find out.
OpenAI is a research and development company founded in 2015 that focuses on developing new technologies. Among these innovations is ChatGPT, a machine learning model that has gained a lot of attention from AI enthusiasts. ChatGPT is designed to be able to answer even complex questions. Philip Wang, the developer of the ChatGPT reverse engineering AI system, has introduced his own text generation model called PaLM+RLHF.
Like ChatGPT, PaLM+RLHF behaves similarly, using a technique called reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to learn how to generate text. Given the apparent power of both AIs, it’s natural to wonder if PaLM+RLHF could potentially replace ChatGPT. In this article, we will explore the strengths and weaknesses of both AIs to determine whether PaLM+RLHF is superior to ChatGPT.
We can trust that any product launched by OpenAI will be reliable, as it is a dedicated organization designed for creating AI products. Both DALLE and ChatGPT can be trusted. On the other hand, PaLM (Pathways language model) is occasionally developed by Philip Wang in association with Google. That is where the name Google comes from, so we can trust PaLM as well. However, it’s worth noting that Google is relatively new to creating AI products, so there may be some reason for doubt about PaLM.
Both OpenAI and PaLM generate text in the way that an AI text generator should. Testing is required to improve the efficiency of any software development project. In terms of cost, it seems that it would be difficult for PaLM to perform multiple tests and provide assurance to users because it is 540 billion parameters in size. A study shows that analyzing 1.5 billion parameters would cost around $1.6 million, and it took approximately 3-4 months to test the large parameter model. As of now, you should use PaLM at your own risk, but once it has been thoroughly tested, it can be relied upon.
Both Chatbot and PaLM are well-known AI tools known for their accurate results. However, sometimes Google’s PaLM does not deliver completely accurate information, but it provides results that are close to the correct answer. We all know that PaLM has a large number of parameters, and this lack of training may contribute to its lower accuracy compared to ChatGPT. Both AI tools are excellent in their respective fields. However, ChatGPT is somewhat superior to Google’s PaLM when considering the above elements. This does not mean that PaLM is useless, however. It may be possible that with further testing, PaLM could surpass ChatGPT.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ans. It is an AI model that works similarly to ChatGPT, but with a wider coverage.
Ans. PaLM allows us to train a single model to do thousands or millions of tasks.
Ans. Yes, it is free.
Ans. It is possible, but it will take time.
- WhatsApp will have a 2GB file sharing document banner, a calling shortcut, and make pinned messages more accessible.
- How to enable Split-screen in Microsoft Edge
- Download Android 13 for Google Pixel LineageOS 20 | LineageOS 20
- How to Go Live on YouTube with a Co-host on Android/iOS
- Update your OnePlus 9 and 9 Pro to avoid bricking your device in restarting mode.